Skip to the content
MinerTerminal

Analysis: the miners' quarterly filed figures over time, and the pooled tests on their quarter-to-quarter changes

Time series, 2019Q1 to 2026Q3

Formulas
How to read it
Every miner's quarterly XBRL series for 8 filed figures on one chart: as filed, rebased so each line starts at 100, or as the log change from the quarter before; switch companies on and off, or overlay all of them as panels of six.
Figure
Scale
Companies

Quarterly revenue for MARA, RIOT, WULF, VIP, ANY and BGDE, where each line starts at 100 in 2020Q2

index, 2020Q2 = 100 · calendar quarters 2019Q1 to 2026Q3 · as of 2026-09-06 · data/analysis/time_series.json

Reading: Of the 6 lines, MARA ends highest, at 61,113 in 2026Q2, and VIP lowest, at 72.45 in 2026Q2.

Quarterly revenue for MARA, RIOT, WULF, VIP, ANY and BGDE, where each line starts at 100 in 2020Q2
PeriodMARA (index, 2020Q2 = 100)RIOT (index, 2020Q2 = 100)WULF (index, 2020Q2 = 100)VIP (index, 2020Q2 = 100)ANY (index, 2020Q2 = 100)BGDE (index, 2020Q2 = 100)
2019Q1
2019Q2
2019Q3
2019Q4
2020Q1
2020Q2100100100100100
2020Q3291.86126.78121.87131.0699.89
2020Q4923.66 (derived)272.45 (derived)164.34 (derived)230.86 (derived)
2021Q13,1981,194119.47236.79105.5100
2021Q210,2471,769165.27346.23100.3484.95
2021Q318,0693,337184.4765.28116.84156.45
2021Q424,106 (derived)4,680 (derived)734.85 (derived)94.84 (derived)285.42 (derived)
2022Q118,0754,1088.44624.04153.98277.58
2022Q28,7093,75653.84490.71215.6282.67
2022Q34,4352,384150.21468.43152.19404.83
2022Q49,9303,097 (derived)371.9 (derived)342.74 (derived)160.27 (derived)240.83 (derived)
2023Q117,8683,771448.33324.42339.62109.62
2023Q228,5713,952600.83314.85613.47150.79
2023Q334,1942,672736.85446.9642.42161.95
2023Q454,783 (derived)4,058 (derived)905.17 (derived)420.42 (derived)863.08 (derived)200.31 (derived)
2024Q157,7294,0831,650413.81779.57268.25
2024Q250,7193,6051,383279.47523.68187.38
2024Q346,0054,3661,052264.36264.31176
2024Q474,921 (derived)7,341 (derived)1,360 (derived)316.61 (derived)296.41 (derived)215.3 (derived)
2025Q174,7438,3101,337411.86316.16197.42
2025Q283,3397,8781,852275.28338.72136.23
2025Q388,2069,2811,966325.77294.39188.27
2025Q470,699 (derived)7,870 (derived)1,393 (derived)245.16 (derived)305.61 (derived)46.18 (derived)
2026Q161,0198,6111,322445.93215.0468.88
2026Q261,1138,9721,74072.45275.287.93
2026Q3
The quarters each selected company carries, and the latest filing behind them
The quarters each chosen company carries, and the latest filing behind them
MARA302019Q12026Q2610-Q filed 2026-08-06
RIOT302019Q12026Q2710-Q filed 2026-08-10
WULF292019Q12026Q2610-Q filed 2026-08-05
VIP242020Q22026Q2510-Q filed 2026-08-14
ANY302019Q12026Q2710-Q filed 2026-08-14
BGDE232019Q32026Q2510-Q filed 2026-08-14

A derived fourth quarter is the fiscal year less the three reported quarters and is marked derived in each chart's table; a quarter held by the scale check is a gap.

Quarter to quarter

4 pooled tests on log changesFormulas
How to read it
The time-series statistics: consecutive quarters of every company stacked into one sample, so a relation is read across quarters rather than across companies. The points are not independent draws, and each card says so.

Revenue on shares

n 229Formulas
Why this test
Whether quarters in which the share count grew were quarters in which revenue grew: dilution against growth, before any price is on file.

229 quarter-pairs from 14 companies: x is the quarter-to-quarter log change in revenue, y the quarter-to-quarter log change in shares outstanding.

MARA 29, RIOT 29, ANY 27, WULF 27, CLSK 22, BGDE 21, VIP 20, CORZ 18, CIFR 13, HUT 12, BTBT 6, IREN 2, KEEL 2, DGXX 1

Pooled across companies and quarters: the points are not independent draws, so the p-value overstates the evidence.

The statistics of quarter-to-quarter log change in shares outstanding on quarter-to-quarter log change in revenue
n229
degrees of freedom227
slope0.1395% interval -0.023 to 0.283
intercept0.028
SST63.2total sum of squares
SSR0.771explained by the fit
SSE62.4left over
R squared0.01SSR over SST
t, slope1.67standard error 0.0777
p, slope0.096two-sided
Pearson r0.11p 0.096
Spearman rho0.06p 0.386
x mean0.0957sd 0.447, variance 0.2, median 0.0537
y mean0.0405sd 0.526, variance 0.277, median 0.0423

computed 2026-09-22 from data as of 2026-09-06, written to data/analysis/time_series.json; formulas

Revenue on cost of revenue

n 176Formulas
Why this test
Whether cost of revenue moves one for one with revenue quarter to quarter.

176 quarter-pairs from 12 companies: x is the quarter-to-quarter log change in revenue, y the quarter-to-quarter log change in cost of revenue.

WULF 27, MARA 23, CLSK 22, BGDE 21, CORZ 21, ANY 17, CIFR 13, HUT 13, RIOT 8, IREN 7, HIVE 2, KEEL 2

Pooled across companies and quarters: the points are not independent draws, so the p-value overstates the evidence.

The statistics of quarter-to-quarter log change in cost of revenue on quarter-to-quarter log change in revenue
n176
degrees of freedom174
slope0.68195% interval 0.541 to 0.822
intercept0.0366
SST51.7total sum of squares
SSR17.8explained by the fit
SSE33.9left over
R squared0.34SSR over SST
t, slope9.55standard error 0.0714
p, slopeunder 0.0001two-sided
Pearson r0.59p under 0.0001
Spearman rho0.60p under 0.0001
x mean0.133sd 0.468, variance 0.219, median 0.0972
y mean0.127sd 0.544, variance 0.296, median 0.0772

computed 2026-09-22 from data as of 2026-09-06, written to data/analysis/time_series.json; formulas

Assets on shares

n 254Formulas
Why this test
Whether balance sheets grew in the quarters the share count grew.

254 quarter-pairs from 14 companies: x is the quarter-to-quarter log change in total assets, y the quarter-to-quarter log change in shares outstanding.

BGDE 29, CLSK 29, MARA 29, RIOT 29, WULF 29, ANY 27, CIFR 20, VIP 20, CORZ 18, HUT 12, BTBT 6, DGXX 2, IREN 2, KEEL 2

Pooled across companies and quarters: the points are not independent draws, so the p-value overstates the evidence.

The statistics of quarter-to-quarter log change in shares outstanding on quarter-to-quarter log change in total assets
n254
degrees of freedom252
slope0.19195% interval 0.0398 to 0.342
intercept0.0392
SST84.5total sum of squares
SSR2.03explained by the fit
SSE82.5left over
R squared0.02SSR over SST
t, slope2.49standard error 0.0768
p, slope0.014two-sided
Pearson r0.15p 0.014
Spearman rho0.21p 0.0008
x mean0.143sd 0.469, variance 0.22, median 0.0278
y mean0.0665sd 0.578, variance 0.334, median 0.0349

computed 2026-09-22 from data as of 2026-09-06, written to data/analysis/time_series.json; formulas

Bitcoin value on revenue

n 81Formulas
Why this test
Whether the marked value of the bitcoin held moved with revenue in the same quarter.

81 quarter-pairs from 14 companies: x is the quarter-to-quarter log change in digital assets at fair value, y the quarter-to-quarter log change in revenue.

RIOT 10, VIP 10, HUT 9, CORZ 8, MARA 8, BTBT 7, CIFR 7, ANY 6, WULF 6, HIVE 5, KEEL 2, BGDE 1, CLSK 1, DGXX 1

Pooled across companies and quarters: the points are not independent draws, so the p-value overstates the evidence.

The statistics of quarter-to-quarter log change in revenue on quarter-to-quarter log change in digital assets at fair value
n81
degrees of freedom79
slope0.02495% interval -0.0397 to 0.0878
intercept-0.00408
SST11.1total sum of squares
SSR0.0786explained by the fit
SSE11left over
R squared0.01SSR over SST
t, slope0.75standard error 0.032
p, slope0.455two-sided
Pearson r0.08p 0.455
Spearman rho0.21p 0.059
x mean0.0627sd 1.3, variance 1.7, median 0.0218
y mean-0.00257sd 0.373, variance 0.139, median 0.0218

computed 2026-09-22 from data as of 2026-09-06, written to data/analysis/time_series.json; formulas